Did you fax a letter
to
House Speaker Pelosi and Chairman George Miller?
If you didn't it's not too late!
Ms. Pelosi 415-861-1670
Mr. Miller 925-674-0983
CALL
TODAY - USE YOUR VOICE!
TELL THEM TO VOTE
NO!
Your
Local Member of Congress 1-888-268-4334
- From your cell phone, enter you cell number and you will speak
with your Local Member of Congress
Speaker Nancy Pelosi San Francisco Office (415) 556-4862 Washington
DC Phone
(202) 225-4965
Congressman
George Miller Concord Office Phone (925) 602-1880 Washington
DC Phone
(202) 225-2095
The battle to
change the so-called "No Child
Left Behind Act" took a dramatic
turn Jan. 7 when a U.S. Court of
Appeals panel sided with NEA's side in
a crucial lawsuit against with the
federal Department of Education.
"The
court's message couldn't be more
clear: If the president is sincere
about continuing No Child Left Behind,
he needs to put his money where his
mouth is," said NEA President Reg
Weaver.
NEA, along with
several state associations and school
districts, went to court back in 2005,
contending that the feds could not
make states and districts spend their
own money, beyond available federal
funds, to carry out the law's
draconian mandates. NEA lawyers
pointed to a specific passage in the
law to that effect.
But the Bush
Administration insisted Washington was
under no obligation to pay. A federal
judge agreed and dismissed the suit.
NEA appealed, and on Jan. 7, the 6th
Circuit Court of Appeals reversed the
earlier ruling, stating that the
Secretary of Education was violating
the spending clause of the
Constitution. The court said if
Congress really wants to make states
and districts pay NCLB costs, Congress
must change the law to say so.
The ruling,
according to NEA general counsel Bob
Chanin, puts states and districts in a
strong position to carry out NCLB
directives only as far as available
federal funds cover. NCLB funds have
fallen $70 billion short of what was
originally promised.
The ruling adds
fuel to efforts by NEA and many others
to overhaul the law. NEA maintains
that a massive increase in federal
funding is a badly needed investment
in the nation's future -- but the
money should go for smaller classes
and other proven ways to improve
children's education, not mandated
high-stakes testing, which, according
to national scores, is not helping.
--
Alain Jehlen
January 2008
You
Did It!
Our
parent organization, CTA, has just
shared information with us regarding
the proposed reauthorization of ESEA/NCLB.
From this communiqué, it is obvious
that the Democratic Leadership is
feeling the heat from teachers
nationwide:
1) There is currently no date set
for consideration of the mark-up bill
by the House. Given the fact that
earlier we had anticipated a
mid-October date for consideration,
this can be viewed as a victory.
Everyday the mark-up does not come to
the floor can be viewed as good news.
2) Rep. Miller has removed his draft of
NCLB from the web and it appears to no
longer be available in cyberspace.
Another good sign that we are having a
definite impact.
3) Even though things appear to be moving
in the right direction, we cannot let
up on the pressure. Resolutions from
labor, school boards, PTAs, or any
other groups are greatly appreciated!
4) NEA has pressured Harry Reid to not
allow any “fast-tracking” of any
Senate version of NCLB, but rather try
to delay it being brought forward once
a new, and hopefully, a more
pro-public education president has
been elected. In response, the US
Senate has now tabled discussion until
next year and the House of
Representatives is moving toward
delaying dialogue until the New Year
as well.
Our
next effort will focus more of our
energies and efforts on our local
congressional representatives and less
on Miller-Pelosi. They have
received a clear message from us. That
doesn’t mean we will quit contacting
Miller and Pelosi’s offices, but we
will direct more of our attention to
the local representatives.
It would appear that nationwide more
and more members of the House are
backing away from the Miller position
and supporting our position, which
eventually helps us achieve the
desired changes. Congratulations
to the TVEA Site Leaders who gathered
over 1000 petitions at their schools.
These have been signed and sent to
both George Miller and Speaker Pelosi,
and have been a part of the national
ESEA/NCLB reform effort.
Teachers Applaud Congress for Taking More Time To Reauthorize Flawed No Child Left Behind Act
CTA Campaign Made a Difference in National Debate Over Law
November 09,
2007
BURLINGAME –
California’s educators are
applauding Congress for postponing
until next year the reauthorization of
President Bush’s flawed No Child
Left Behind Act. CTA members spent
recent months in a statewide campaign
to warn that fast-tracking a draft
NCLB proposal would hurt students,
teachers and schools.
“The voices of California’s
teachers are finally being heard in
Congress,” said David A. Sanchez,
president of the 340,000-member
California Teachers Association. “We
welcome the chance to work with
Congress in the coming months to
erase, rewrite and reauthorize this
law. The law is supposed to be helping
our public schools of greatest need,
but instead its one-size-fits-all
approach to learning is hurting our
students. It forces teachers to teach
to the test rather than provide
students with a well-rounded
education.”
California's teachers remain vigilant
in their effort to secure a
reauthorization of No Child Left
Behind that improves teaching and
learning and is adequately funded.
This week, U.S. Rep. George Miller,
chair of the House Education and Labor
Committee, criticized the president's
threatened veto of a bill that would
provide adequate funding for the
chronically underfunded 2001 law.
Current funding is $56 billion less
than what NCLB requires. The veto
threat makes it unlikely that the
House will take up reauthorization
this year. The U.S. Senate has already
indicated it will not.
The past two months CTA members made
more than 15,000 phone calls to
members of Congress, wrote post cards,
e-mailed legislators and participated
in local rallies asking Congress to
oppose a draft House NCLB
reauthorization proposal that would
have placed even greater emphasis on
test scores. The campaign also
included Internet ads and radio spots.
Teachers and parents want a federal
education law that measures students
and schools on more than standardized
test scores and uses reforms that have
been proven to work, such as restoring
the federal class size reduction
program. The law should be adequately
funded and provide resources for
quality teacher training, mentors for
new teachers, and programs that
improve parental and family
involvement in our schools.
CTA’s NCLB campaign is archived at www.cta.org.
One compelling section, “NCLB
Stories from the Front Lines,”
features written testimony from
teachers across the state telling how
the law is hurting our students.
CTA SPEAKS OUT!
View
video of CTA President David A.
Sanchez and other CTA leaders urging
Congress to say NO to Pelosi/Miller
NCLB proposal
What’s
Wrong With the No Child Left Behind
Act?
September
10, 2007
•
The No Child Left Behind Act is
hurting our students, teachers and
schools. Its
failed one-size-fits-all approach to
education ignores the individual
needs of our students. Parents and
teachers know all children
do not learn in the same way or at the
same pace.
•
NCLB grades student and school success
based on a snapshot of mandated,
standardized tests given on a single
day. The focus on testing
forces teachers to teach to the test
and has decimated programs like
art, music, social studies and
physical education.
•
NCLB sets up schools to fail. This
year NCLB labeled one out of every
four California public schools as
failing. Instead of punishing schools,
we need a system that provides
assistance and resources to help
all students and schools succeed.
•
NCLB has not improved student
learning. According to the Harvard
Civil Rights
Project NCLB did not have a
significant impact on improving
reading and math achievement scores
and it has not helped narrow
achievement gaps. The research shows
the law has actually shortchanged
schools that serve predominantly
disadvantaged, minority
students with an over reliance on
sanctions rather than assistance.
•
The President and Congress have broken
their promise to fully fund the
law, making NCLB a federally mandated
burden on local school districts.
The shortfall in promised federal
funding now exceeds $56 billion.
ESEA / NCLB Background
The Elementary
and Secondary Education Act (ESEA),
renamed the "No Child Left
Behind" (NCLB) Act of 2001 by the
Bush Administration, will come up for
renewal in September 2007. That means
the U.S. Congress is now holding
hearings to consider changes to the
law. Final action may not happen until
2008 or even later, but CTA, NEA, and
teachers are mobilizing now for a
major role in passing legislation that
better meets the needs of students and
teachers.
ESEA/NCLB established praise-worthy
goals — high standards and
accountability for the learning of all
children, regardless of their
background or ability. It also
requires all teachers in core subjects
to be "highly qualified" by
the end of the current school year.
As well as being seriously flawed, the
ESEA/NCLB Act has been consistently
under-funded. Funding for this Act in
California fell more than $2.2 billion
short of originally promised levels
this year alone, and educators say the
results are seen in the ability of
schools to meet federal mandates for
student achievement. Of California's
9,188 public schools, 4,055 (44%)
failed to make annual yearly progress
(AYP) under ESEA/NCLB and 1,772
schools (19%) failed to meet federal
AYP for the second consecutive year,
and are subject to federally mandated
sanctions.
The U.S. Department of Education (DOE)
had announced that no state has met a
requirement that calls for 100 percent
of teachers in core subjects to be
"highly qualified" by the
end of 2006. California's standards
for becoming certificated teachers are
among the highest in the nation. In
fact, the U.S. DOE has commended the
state for implementing teacher quality
regulations, but funds to support
retention of highly qualified teachers
have been cut by more than $33
million. Consequently, no state in the
nation has met this requirement.